Human security Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Human gage - Essay ExampleThe author believes that the deeper understanding on the ideas will be attained by examining the opposing and concordant views on human security. The articles reviewed have bend as compelling as they present realistic and eye-opener accounts, yet antithetical in some degree. Overview of Chandlers Work The article by David Chandler entitled, Human security department The Dog That Didnt Bark provides an important divine revelation on the deconstruction of myth that human security shows a typical conflict between the defer and the individual security (Owen 2008). Chandlers article is based on the analysis of the 2 books namely, Human Security Concepts and Implications write by Shahrbanou Tadjbakhsh & Anuradha M. Chenoy and A Decade of Human Security Global Governance and New Multilateralisms written by Mclean, Black & Shaw. Chandler started his argument through citing the idea that global policy making overbearingly suggests two different views. One view pointed out the construal of the dynamics of the societys power relationships and inequalities, as salutary as insecurities. The other view pertained to the idea of identifying the interrelatedness, interconnection, and susceptibilities of security threats and the urgency for composite, cooperative, human-centered answers. Chandlers First melody While Tadjbakhsh and Chenoy claimed that human, as well as the state, should work interdependently, Chandler (2008) conceded that human and the state are indivisible, yet gave setting to the importance of examining the problem that transpires regarding the states collaboration of its idea outside of its absolute model. Chandler ended up criticizing that the authors are more involved with advocacies instead of the evaluation of definite process of human security. Chandlers first of all argument stated that human security exaggerates new post-cold war security threats (Chandler 2008, 435). This argument is compelling as it contradicts to the paradigm of human security. The author contended that one of the prevailing reasons why the human security has been applied wrong by the state is because it overstated the post-cold war security threats. Chandler (2008) claimed that with the absence of conventional adversaries like terrorists, human security processes close the gap securitization issue like environmental, health, and economic security. Nevertheless, inquiry is not about how these issues are securitized just now rather it is more important to evaluate the result of these actions. Since Chandler declined to elaborate the result of these actions, it is safe to assume that he falls short of accusing Tadjbakhsh and Chenoy for not considering the connection between normative theory and policy procedures. Chandlers Second Argument Further, Chandler (2008, 435) argued that human security advocates locate these threats in the developing world. While there are other part of the developed countries, which also have secur ity problems, advocates can also be considered as correct since majority of the people who experienced security problems like extreme poverty are determined in developing countries. These people are more vulnerable that is why it has given more attention. In contrast, Chandler (2008) argued that the causal link of human security processes in a globalized world do not inhabit at all is somewhat questionable since the actual connection solely depends on what dependent unsettled is utilized. As what Paris (2001) suggests,